Sifter
Tower of Fantasy cover art

Tower of Fantasy

Steam

Hotta Studio · Perfect World Games

ActionMassively MultiplayerRPG
View on Steam

Design Risk Score

Verified data

91/100

6 concern patterns detected

Monetization62pts
Manipulation12pts
Compulsion17pts

Joy Index

39/100

Fair

Community score: 66/100
Joy reflects genuine enjoyment after accounting for design risk.

Verdict

Red Flag

Red flags: aggressive design detected

This game employs multiple mechanisms designed to maximize spending over enjoyment. Proceed with extreme caution.

Want a reading tuned to what youcare about? Connect your Steam library — your “For you” score stays entirely in your browser.

Score your library →

Detected Design Patterns

Daily Login Hook

Rewards tuned to make you log in every day regardless of genuine desire to play.

Energy System

Artificial play limits create urgency and pressure to return or pay to continue.

FOMO Pressure

Time-limited content creates fear of missing out, driving compulsive engagement.

Gacha Loop

Variable reward schedules exploit gambling psychology to keep players spending.

Pay-to-Progress

Progression gated behind purchases creates artificial frustration to drive spending.

Learn about these patterns in the Pattern Registry →

Why this score

Verified data
  • Pay-to-Win+25

    Paying grants a direct gameplay or competitive advantage.

  • Gacha System+25

    Randomised paid pulls for characters/gear that affect power.

  • Microtransactions+12

    In-game purchases sells items that affect gameplay or progression.

  • FOMO Events+12

    Time-limited content tied to spending pressure.

  • Energy System+12

    Artificial play limits pressure you to wait or pay to continue.

  • Daily Login Bonus+5

    Daily rewards nudge habitual logins regardless of genuine desire.

Points reflect severity, not just presence — cosmetic-only purchases score far lower than pay-for-power. Total: 91/100. How scoring works →

Is Tower of Fantasy worth it? Design Risk 91/100 · Sifter